[HTML][HTML] Lipoprotein lipase and sphingomyelinase synergistically enhance the association of atherogenic lipoproteins with smooth muscle cells and extracellular …

I Tabas, Y Li, RW Brocia, SW Xu, TL Swenson… - Journal of Biological …, 1993 - Elsevier
I Tabas, Y Li, RW Brocia, SW Xu, TL Swenson, KJ Williams
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1993Elsevier
Prominent features of atheromata include smooth muscle cells, cholesteryl ester-loaded
macrophage foam cells, extracellular matrix, extracellularly trapped and aggregated
lipoproteins, and various enzymes including lipoprotein lipase (LpL) and sphingomyelinase
(SMase). The interplay of these factors was investigated in cell culture. Incubation of bovine
aortic smooth muscle cells for 18 h at 37 degrees C with low density lipoprotein (LDL) in the
presence of LpL and SMase led to massive aggregation of LDL on the surface of the cells as …
Prominent features of atheromata include smooth muscle cells, cholesteryl ester-loaded macrophage foam cells, extracellular matrix, extracellularly trapped and aggregated lipoproteins, and various enzymes including lipoprotein lipase (LpL) and sphingomyelinase (SMase). The interplay of these factors was investigated in cell culture. Incubation of bovine aortic smooth muscle cells for 18 h at 37 degrees C with low density lipoprotein (LDL) in the presence of LpL and SMase led to massive aggregation of LDL on the surface of the cells as viewed by phase, fluorescence (using 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethyl-indocarbocyanine perchlorate-LDL), and electron microscopy. This aggregation required both enzymes. Studies with 125I-LDL confirmed these observations: 125I-LDL cell association in the presence of LpL plus SMase was 50-100-fold greater than in the absence of the two enzymes and was 10-fold greater than in the presence of either enzyme alone. A similar effect (68-fold enhancement) was seen with 125I-labeled lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), another atherogenic lipoprotein. In all cases, 125I-lipoprotein degradation was relatively low (< 5% of cell-associated material). LpL/SMase-mediated association of 125I-LDL with smooth muscle cells was still observed when enzymatically inactive LpL was used. The effect was markedly diminished when the smooth muscle cells were treated with a combination of chondroitin ABC lyase and heparitinase or when mutant Chinese hamster ovary cells that lack cell-surface proteoglycans were used, indicating a specific role for cellular proteoglycans. When smooth muscle cells with 125I-LDL or 125I-Lp(a) aggregates were rinsed and then coincubated with mouse peritoneal macrophages for a further 24 h, visible aggregates disappeared, and there was marked 125I-lipoprotein degradation. Electron micrographs after 24 h of co-culture showed lipid-laden, foamy macrophages situated on top of smooth muscle cells, suggesting that the macrophages phagocytosed and metabolized the smooth muscle cell-associated LDL aggregates. Last, 125I-LDL association with smooth muscle cell extracellular matrix was also synergistically enhanced by LpL and SMase, to a level that was 19-fold greater than in the absence of the two enzymes. Thus, the interaction of LDL and Lp(a) with four atheroma components, namely, smooth muscle cells, extracellular matrix, LpL, and SMase, represents a physiologically plausible mechanism for massive, focal retention and aggregation of atherogenic lipoproteins in the arterial wall with subsequent macrophage foam cell formation.
Elsevier