Clinical presentation, long-term follow-up, and outcomes of 1001 arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy patients and family members

JA Groeneweg, A Bhonsale, CA James… - Circulation …, 2015 - Am Heart Assoc
JA Groeneweg, A Bhonsale, CA James, AS Te Riele, D Dooijes, C Tichnell, B Murray…
Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, 2015Am Heart Assoc
Background—Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is a
progressive cardiomyopathy. We aimed to define long-term outcome in a transatlantic cohort
of 1001 individuals. Methods and Results—Clinical and genetic characteristics and follow-
up data of ARVD/C index-patients (n= 439, fulfilling of 2010 criteria in all) and family
members (n= 562) were assessed. Mutations were identified in 276 index-patients (63%).
Index-patients presented predominantly with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (268; 61%) …
Background
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is a progressive cardiomyopathy. We aimed to define long-term outcome in a transatlantic cohort of 1001 individuals.
Methods and Results
Clinical and genetic characteristics and follow-up data of ARVD/C index-patients (n=439, fulfilling of 2010 criteria in all) and family members (n=562) were assessed. Mutations were identified in 276 index-patients (63%). Index-patients presented predominantly with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (268; 61%). During a median follow-up of 7 years, 301 of the 416 index-patients presenting alive (72%) experienced sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Sudden cardiac death during follow-up occurred more frequently among index-patients without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (10/63, 16% versus 2/335, 0.6%). Overall, cardiac mortality and the need for cardiac transplantation were low (6% and 4%, respectively). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar in index-patients with and without mutations, as well as in those with familial and nonfamilial ARVD/C. ARVD/C was diagnosed in 207 family members (37%). Symptoms at first evaluation correlated with disease expression. Family members with mutations were more likely to meet Task Force Criteria for ARVD/C (40% versus 18%), experience sustained ventricular arrhythmias (11% versus 1%), and die from a cardiac cause (2% versus 0%) than family members without mutations.
Conclusions
Long-term outcome was favorable in diagnosed and treated ARVD/C index-patients and family members. Outcome in index-patients was modulated by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, but not by mutation status and familial background of disease. One third of family members developed ARVD/C. Outcome in family members was determined by symptoms at first evaluation and mutations.
Am Heart Assoc